Excellent! While there is no legal requirement or obligation for proponents to provide capacity funding1 to Indigenous groups, it is in your interest to ensure that they are able to engage with you.
Some potential costs that Indigenous groups might incur to engage with you include:
- Staff time (e.g., natural resources manager or lands manager) spent reviewing documents and communicating with you.
- Other office resources (e.g., admin time, printing and scanning documents, etc.) related to reviewing your project, scheduling meetings, sending correspondence, etc.
- Travel (time and costs) to attend meetings with you.
- Time spent by community knowledge holders (e.g., Elders) to provide feedback on your project area and potential concerns (this is often addressed via “honouraria” or per diems).
Providing a reasonable level of funding to these groups may assist your engagement process by allowing them to dedicate staff and/or time to review and discuss your project. For more advanced, larger exploration projects in communities with little to no capacity, it may be reasonable to provide funding for the Indigenous group to contract third-party experts to assist them with their review of project documents.
Some Indigenous groups have developed their own engagement guidelines or policies, which may include fees and/or per diems expected from proponents at certain engagement stages. Most Indigenous groups who have such policies will let you know when you first approach them. Make sure you know their fees and budgets before drafting your overall engagement budget.
It can be a challenge to determine what is reasonable in terms of reimbursing an Indigenous group for the costs they incur engaging with your project.
You may wish to consider the stage of your project, scale of your exploration program, volume of information being sent by you to the Indigenous group regarding your project, and ability of your budget to cover such costs. It is important to negotiate a succinct capacity funding agreement that clearly describes deliverables and formalizes any such payments you may make.
If you are aware of other proponents working in the vicinity, consider reaching out to them to inquire if they have any recent experience with the Indigenous group, and whether they are aware of any specific communication protocols and/or fees. This may assist you in determining reasonable budget allocations.
Proponents have varying levels of capacity, both in terms of staff and financial resources. Smaller junior explorers often have limited resources to support capacity funding programs. It is still possible to undertake a meaningful engagement program even if you are not able to cover all of an Indigenous group’s anticipated engagement costs. Being open with the Indigenous group about the stage and scale of your project (and the exploration process in general) will help them understand your own financial limitations.
Some examples of ways to balance capacity challenges of both an Indigenous group and a proponent include:
- Travelling to the Indigenous group’s location/office to meet and exchange information about the project, rather than asking them to travel.
- Holding in-person meetings whenever possible to present and discuss new project information, rather than sending large documents with requests for review and comments by a certain date.
- Ensuring that proponent representatives who attend such meetings are knowledgeable about the project, potential effects and mitigation measures, and can speak in plain language without industry jargon.
- Working with community representatives to schedule a public meeting at a time when most community members should be able to attend, and providing catering for a meal, if possible.
- Showing an openness to discuss and negotiate future funding or economic agreements if the project progresses to a later stage of exploration where budgets might allow additional room for this.
- Considering other ways to increase capacity and/or training in the community within your project budget, such as provision of job opportunities for community members on the exploration team, and/or contract opportunities for local, qualified Indigenous-owned businesses (e.g., catering, expediting, core boxes, etc.).
1 This discussion is specific to considering funding for engagement activities directly between a proponent and an Indigenous group; consultation processes conducted by government during a regulatory/permitting process, while they may be informed by the proponent’s engagement activities, are separate and should not be funded by proponents; any funding requests to respond to a government consultation process should be directed to government to address.
While there is no legal requirement or obligation for proponents to provide capacity funding2 to Indigenous groups, it may be useful to consider, especially when working with groups with capacity challenges. Capacity challenges can include a lack of knowledge or experience with the mineral exploration industry, a shortage of employees dedicated to reviewing natural resource project proposals, and/or a lack of financial capacity to support community members or representatives to attend project-related meetings. Remote communities may have additional challenges, such as inconsistent internet connectivity (making electronic engagement on project documents difficult and time-consuming), and difficulty travelling to meetings.
When you ask an Indigenous group to engage with you on your project, they may incur costs such as:
- Staff time (e.g., natural resources manager, lands manager, or contracted subject matter expert) spent reviewing documents and communicating with you.
- Other office resources (e.g., admin time, printing and scanning documents, etc.) related to reviewing your project, scheduling meetings, sending correspondence, etc.
- Travel (time and costs) to attend meetings with you.
- Time spent by community knowledge holders (e.g., Elders) to provide feedback on your project area and potential concerns (this is often addressed via “honouraria” or per diems).
Providing a reasonable level of funding to these groups may assist your process of engagement by allowing them to dedicate staff and/or time to review and discuss your project. For more advanced, larger exploration projects in communities with little to no capacity, it may be reasonable to provide funding for the Indigenous group to contract third-party experts to assist them with their review of project documents.
Smaller junior explorers often have limited resources to support capacity funding programs. It is still possible to undertake a meaningful engagement program even if you are not able to cover all of an Indigenous group’s anticipated engagement costs. Being open with the Indigenous group about the stage and scale of your project (and the exploration process in general) will help them understand your own financial limitations.
Some examples of ways to balance capacity challenges of both an Indigenous group and a proponent include:
- Travelling to the Indigenous group’s location/office to meet and exchange information about the project, rather than asking them to travel.
- Holding in-person meetings whenever possible to present and discuss new project information, rather than sending large documents with requests for review and comments by a certain date.
- Ensuring that proponent representatives who attend such meetings are knowledgeable about the project, potential effects and mitigation measures, and can speak in plain language without industry jargon.
- Working with community representatives to schedule a public meeting at a time when most community members should be able to attend, and providing catering for a meal, if possible.
- Being open to discuss and negotiate future funding or economic agreements if the project progresses to a later stage of exploration.
- Considering other ways to increase capacity and/or training in the community within your project budget, such as provision of job opportunities for community members on the exploration team, and/or contract opportunities for local, qualified Indigenous-owned businesses (e.g., catering, expediting, core boxes, etc.).
Some Indigenous groups have developed their own engagement guidelines or compensation policies, which may include fees and/or per diems expected from proponents at certain stages of engagement. While it may be reasonable to expect reimbursement of time and resources used by staff or other representatives of the Indigenous group on your project, some proponents may need assistance in determining what amount is reasonable depending on the circumstances.
You may wish to consider the stage of your project, scale of your exploration program, volume of information being sent by you to the Indigenous group regarding your project, and the ability of your budget to cover such costs. It may also be useful to consider negotiating a succinct capacity funding agreement that formalizes any such payments you may make, and other responsibilities expected by each party of the other (e.g., review of materials within a certain time frame).
Most Indigenous groups who have engagement or compensation policies will let you know upon initial communication with you. If you wish to prepare an initial engagement budget prior to contacting them, you can check if the group has their own website; many do, and they may have engagement and communication information housed there (some even post their policies). While the absence of such information on their website does not mean a group does not have such a policy, it is a good place to start seeking information to inform your engagement plan and budget.
If you are aware of other proponents working in the same vicinity, you may wish to consider reaching out to them to inquire if they have any recent experience with the Indigenous group, and whether they are aware of any specific communication protocols and/or fees.
2 This discussion is specific to considering funding for engagement activities directly between a proponent and an Indigenous group; consultation processes conducted by government during a regulatory/permitting process, while they may be informed by the proponent’s engagement activities, are separate and should not be funded by proponents; any funding requests to respond to a government consultation process should be directed to government to address.
References: